If you are currently using PlanSwift for general takeoff but find yourself struggling with complex site work, v3 is the logical upgrade. It is particularly effective for: General contractors managing site prep. Excavation and grading subcontractors. Paving companies. Landscape architects.
Automating subgrade deductions eliminates the manual math where most estimators make mistakes.
The revised v3 takeoff showed 20,000 CY cut and 20,500 CY fill. By adjusting the fine grade, they achieved true balance . planswift earthwork pro v3
For mid-sized contractors (annual revenue $2M–$20M) who need speed without a steep learning curve, PlanSwift Earthwork Pro v3 is the winner. Agtek remains superior for massive highway projects, while v3 dominates residential site development and commercial pads.
To help you get the most out of your site prep estimates, tell me a bit more about your typical projects: If you are currently using PlanSwift for general
In the high-stakes world of commercial construction, the "dirt work" phase is often where budgets live or die. It is a deceptively simple part of the job: move dirt from here to there. Yet, miscalculating the volume of cut and fill by even a small percentage can result in six-figure overruns, delayed timelines, and furious stakeholders.
Cross-reference your takeoff report with the geotechnical report to adjust for soil expansion (swell) and compaction (shrink) factors. Paving companies
Accurately predicting the expansion (swell) and compaction (shrink) factors of soil prevents unexpected trucking fees.
Comparing like InSite or Agtek.
The v3 update introduced several refinements aimed at speed and visual validation.